Fun With Numbers
by Robert James Reese » Friday, December 11th, 2009 » 4 Comments
I've been playing around with the McMillan's Running Calculator lately, comparing my different race paces and looking for areas of improvement. The results weren't too surprising. My half marathon is lagging considerably when compared to the other distances. I've been really frustrated with my inability to run a solid half lately and am hoping to rectify that come January and the Manhattan Half. One thing I didn't expect though was for my mile time to be faster than what my marathon would suggest – I feel like all 3 miles I ran this year were poor races. I guess that makes me feel a little better about failing to reach my goal for 2009 of running a sub-5:00 mile. Maybe that was more ambitious than I thought. Obviously, I didn't train much for it specifically, but I just assumed that it would come with an increased level of fitness. It still remains to be seen whether I even bother putting that goal on the list for 2010. More on that another day though... Here are the numbers:
The highlighted cells are my actual race times. The rest of each row is filled with the predictions based on that highlighted time.
An unrelated note: I just found a bunch of comments in the Wordpress spam queue that weren't spam. Sorry to those folks who wrote them – I wasn't trying to censor you. Promise.
| Mile | 10K | Half Marathon | Marathon |
| 5:14 | 37:40 | 1:23:48 | 2:56:45 |
| 5:19 | 38:20 | 1:25:18 | 2:59:54 |
| 5:27 | 39:14 | 1:27:17 | 3:04:05 |
| 5:16 | 37:54 | 1:24:20 | 2:57:52 |
The highlighted cells are my actual race times. The rest of each row is filled with the predictions based on that highlighted time.
An unrelated note: I just found a bunch of comments in the Wordpress spam queue that weren't spam. Sorry to those folks who wrote them – I wasn't trying to censor you. Promise.
4 Comments
Leave a Comment